my one skip slooowly creeps towards +100
it's at +84 now which is nice
i'm not actually convinced i like it that much anymore but i'm still proud of it
idk if that makes any sense
like i made the concept work to the best of my ability and people liked it. how i feel about it is no longer really relevant
OKAY NOW I REALLY CAN'T TALK ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT CROSSLINKS TO 3972 AND IT SUCKS
i don't even know if what's written in the final piece makes any sense because i just copied what they said i should put, i don't know anythinga bout guns
i have decided that i will actually link it but before you click the link you have to promise you understand that while i think the concept is interesting i wish i had executed it better https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2544
it was 2018 it was a different time (it was not a different time)
it is so fuckin cool that someone translated it to chinese though http://scp-wiki-cn.wikidot.com/scp-2544
NO idea if the translation is even okay but wow they must have really like dit
@monorail tbh 3972 is on my list of like five or six of mine that I think suck now so I think this is just a natural reaction to having published on the website
@kate faaair but like, the way my thing works kind of messes with the distinction between cognitohazards and infohazards in a weird way and i just grabbed 3972 as an example of a relatively harmless and easy-to-control infohazard they could use to test it with
and i know there's no canon but it'd really suck if the author was there to say "that's not how it works" LMAO
@monorail luckily I am absolutely allergic to explaining or deciding how things work. i death of the author myself on all my scps, interpret it as you will
one of the critters told me i should write out the specific model of gun used in one of the experiments so i did and now i really regret it, it's totally unnecessary detail that would scan better as just "a handgun" but wow what a bizarre minor edit that would be after not touching it since 2018